Theoretical mean sea level and geodetical leveling systems in Finland
Annual theoretical mean sea level values on the Finnish coast referenced to the geodetic height systems (N2000, N60, N43 and NN) are given in the tables below.
At the Finnish mareographs, sea level is measured related to a fixed reference level of each mareograph. This reference level is bound to the geodetic height systems, and its datum (zero level) lies about two meters below the estimated mean sea level of 1921. The possible movement of a mareograph related to its reference level is checked by annual levelings to a nearby benchmark. Every three years the stability of the mareograph and its benchmark is verified by levelings to other local bedrockbound benchmarks.
There are four geodetic height systems currently in use in Finland:

N2000: The height system N2000 is based on the Third Leveling of Finland (1978–2006). It is a Finnish realization of the common European height system, and its datum is derived from NAP (Normaal Amsterdams Peil). The heights of N2000 differ 13–43 cm from the heights of the previous Finnish national height system N60. Most of the difference is due to the land uplift during 40 years: the N2000 heights are corrected for vertical motion to the epoch 2000, and those of N60 to 1960. There are also differences in the computation methods.

N60: The height system N60 was calculated based on the two earlier highprecision levelings after the second one was completed. The land uplift was also taken into account. Thus, N60 is considered to correspond to the geoid more accurately than the previous systems, NN or N43.

N43: The second highprecision leveling in Finland was carried out in 1935  1975. The height system N43 vas defined based on the results of the years 1935  1955. In defining this height system, the whole leveling network was not used. Land uplift during the measurement period was not taken into account either.

NN: The first highprecision leveling in Finland was carried out in 1892 – 1910, resulting in the height system NN. However, it did not correspond to the geoid as accurately as N60. The zero level for NN was defined to be the zero point of a water level scale situated at Katajanokka, Helsinki. It was 30.465 meters below the main benchmark of Finland, located near the Astronomical Observatory in Helsinki.
The mean sea level referenced to these height systems has been decreasing over the past decades. Thus, the so called theoretical mean sea level (MW) has been adopted.
The theoretical mean sea level (or theoretical mean water, MW) is an estimate for the longterm mean value (more precisely, expectation value) of sea level, made for practical purposes. Land uplift, global sea level rise, as well as changes in the Baltic Sea water balance are taken into account. Because of these changes the theoretical mean sea level is not a constant. The rate of change of the theoretical mean sea level from year to year is not constant either, due to changing rate of the global sea level rise and changes in the Baltic Sea water balance. The Finnish Meteorological Institute confirms the height of the theoretical mean sea level annually, using the most recent knowledge on the past and future changes of the factors affecting the sea level.
The theoretical mean sea level is commonly used in Finland as a reference level when sea level information is given for instance on the internet or radio and in the newspapers.
More information on land uplift and the effects of sea level rise on the Finnish coast is available on the Climate Guide web site (see the link on the right side of this page).
Examples of height system calculations
Example 1.
In 2000, a sea level value of +15 cm, referenced to the theoretical mean sea level, was measured at Helsinki. The sea level is converted to N2000 and N60 systems, respectively, as follows:

The heights of the theoretical mean sea level in 2000 (MW2000) in relation to the N2000 system, +186 mm, and in relation to the N60 system, 66 mm, at Helsinki are obtained from the mean sea level table. Thus, the zero level of MW2000 is 186 mm above the zero level of N2000, and 66 mm below the zero level of N60.

The sea level in N2000 is: +15 cm + 18.6 cm = +33.6 cm

The sea level in N60 is: +15 cm  6.6 cm = +8.4 cm.
Example 2.
In 2012, a sea level value of 22 cm, referenced to the theoretical mean sea level of 2012 (MW2012), was measured at Pietarsaari. The sea level in relation to the theoretical mean sea level of 2005 (MW2005) is obtained as follows, utilizing the geodetic height systems:
Using the N2000 height system:

The MW2012 zero level is 107 mm above the zero level of the N2000 system.

The MW2005 zero level is 137 mm above the zero level of the N2000 system.

Thus, the zero level of MW2005 is 30 mm above the zero level of MW2012.

The sea level in MW2005 is: 22 cm – 3.0 cm = 25.0 cm
Using the N60 height system:

The MW2012 zero level is 333 mm below the zero level of the N60 system.

The MW2005 zero level is 303 mm below the zero level of the N60 system.

Thus, the zero level of MW2005 is 30 mm above the zero level of MW2012.

The sea level in MW2005 is: 22 cm  3.0 cm = 25.0 cm
Example 3.
How much has the land risen from the sea at Pietarsaari during 19602010? How much during 20002010?

The height of the theoretical mean sea level in 1960 (MW1960) in relation to the N2000 system is +464 mm at Pietarsaari, as obtained from the mean sea level table. Likewise, the height of the theoretical mean sea level in 2010 (MW2010) is +115 mm.

Between 1960 and 2010, the land has risen 464 mm – 115 mm = 349 mm. The average rate of rise was 7.0 mm/v during these 50 years.

The height of the theoretical mean sea level in 2000 (MW2000) in relation to the N2000 system is +162 mm, see the mean sea level table.

Between 2000 and 2010, the land has risen 162 mm – 115 mm = 47 mm. The average rate of rise was 4.7 mm/v during these 10 years.